Lesson – legal rights and legal obligations are correlated. If someone has a right, then someone else must have a duty and vice versa. Section 2(m) of the Limitation Act, 1963 treats tort as a civil injustice that is not simply a breach of contract or breach of trust. Tort law deals only with legal rights. In the legal suitability section of the CLAT, approximately 35 to 29 questions are asked. Once a legal damage has been established, the court will grant you a remedy. Although this concept has deep roots and different themes, the CLAT document does not contain questions from deeper concepts. Therefore, there is no need to read from a full-fledged manual for offenses, a small reminder of concepts will do. Introductory question – Tort law: The offence refers to a civil offence that is not exclusively a breach of contract or breach of trust. This definition comes from Law A. Limitation period B.

The Specific Remedies ActC. Indian Contract LawD. None of the above statements Section 2(m) of the Limitation Act 1963 deals with tort as a civil offence that is not simply a breach of contract or breach of trust. See solution The court orders restitution when a thing or object needs to be restored by the injured party either on the condition: To help you easily resolve the section on legal adequacy, we have provided some of the best preparation tips for CLAT Legal Aptitude in the following post. Introductory question – Tort lawDeclaration yourself:Damnum sine injuria means ——————— A. Damage without injury B. Violation without damageDeclaration – There is no violation of the law. Explained in the Glouster Grammer School case. See the principle of the solution: “A” commits a crime if he convinces “B” without legal justification to violate his contract with “C”. The strike is a violation of the employment contract. Lesson – Illegal conduct is not necessarily a “wrong” or an illegal act.

This is an issue that only violates a person`s legal right. The offences constitute a violation of the private or civil law of the premises. A tort affects a person`s private rights. A crime, on the other hand, affects society as a whole. To help you get an idea of the type of questions asked in the exam, we have provided some examples of tort law questions based on the claT passage. Practice is the only key to trying to try the law of tort in the examination. Try to practice as many questions as possible from last year`s question documents for CLAT, as this will help you improve your reading speed and time management skills during the final exam. Reason: In a convoluted claim for bodily harm or negligence, the defendant`s good character would be relevant, but proof of character is not accepted in convoluted claims, while in criminal proceedings it is accepted for the same crimes of assault or negligence. Without a legal claim, you cannot make a successful tort claim. In fact, the law of tort will not even be applicable.

This makes it the most important element, because in its absence, the rest is useless. Unlike the other chapters of this article, there is no simple act for the law of tort. It is a set of legal rules and uncodified conduct framed by judicial precedents. Tort law is part of the common law system that is not based on statutes. Any breach under this particular line of law will be corrected in a civil action for damages. This implies that tort law exists only to remedy the civil injustice under which the plaintiff is awarded unliquidated damages as compensation. Wondering what kind of questions are being asked about this? Well, this article is designed to provide you with the passages-based questions about CLAT exam offenses, preparation tips to solve legal eligibility issues, and more. There are questions based on the issue of tort law in the “Legal Eligibility” section of the CLAT exam.

(A) Mr Mehta is right. (B) Strike is a workers` right, so there is nothing wrong with going on strike. (C) Mr. Mehta committed an offence. (D) Mr. Jose committed an offence. “Counterfeiting” means infringement, while “Damnum” means actual injury/property damage. A person`s legal right is violated or violated by another person`s misconduct. Option (C) is correct. This case is based on Stanley vs.

Powell. The defense of the inevitable accident can rightly be claimed by Sandy. He had been cautious and could not have foreseen that the ball would slip from the bark.