Physician and epidemiologist John Cassel and psychiatrist Sidney Cobb officially proposed the stress buffer hypothesis in 1976. Both researchers supported the idea that people with strong social ties were protected from the potential pathogenic effects of stress-generating events. Cassel thought that if one. a) Discovery: Research is a matter of discovery. From start to finish, the law student or lawyer discovers new arguments, legal provisions, positions on related issues and new ways of doing things. Research can also reveal new aspects and approaches to old topics. For example, if a general idea has been developed on a particular topic, effective research can allow the researcher to discover and discover new perspectives on those topics. Legal research is a systematic understanding of the law that takes into account its progress. The law usually works within society and the two influence each other.

Each type of research methodology has its own value. However, when researching, a researcher may face certain obstacles that can be avoided if they properly plan the research process. Qualitative legal research is a subjective form of research based on the analysis of controlled observations of the legal researcher. In qualitative research, data are obtained from a relatively small group of subjects. The data are not analyzed using statistical techniques. Typically, narrative data is collected through qualitative research. Importance of legal research Research involves a scientific and targeted investigation or investigation of a problem or topic in a discipline. Similarly, legal research is a scientific investigation of a legal problem or problem and the process of gathering evidence or information to establish a hypothesis or verification of certain hypotheses.

Research aims to add new knowledge to the body of existing knowledge in an area of interest. b) Reinforcement: Good research helps the researcher clarify ideas on topics relevant to their work. If a researcher is able to find reliable sources on a topic, these can make it clear to the researcher, especially if there has been confusion or misunderstanding about a topic. 3. Critical research: As we know, the purpose of legal research is not only to make proposals for legal reform. It can also be used for many other purposes. However, if the purpose of the research is only to indicate how it should be conducted, this research is called critical research because, in such cases, the objective is to identify a common principle or standard and is therefore also called “normative research”. In this type of research, the collected material is carefully examined and a common thread is identified, which eventually becomes the basic standard. When consulting legal articles, encyclopedias, journals, abstracts and codes, a variety of index terms are useful for examining women`s issues. For modern sources, well-known index terms such as “woman,” “sexual harassment,” and “marriage” have been used since the 1960s. The best technique for searching an index is to start with a narrow term and broaden the search. For example, if you`re trying to determine if a state has battered woman syndrome laws, start with the narrow term “battered woman syndrome.” If this doesn`t work, expand your search to “domestic violence.” If you can`t find any of these terms, use the broader term “domestic violence.” Searching through antonyms, synonyms and related words of all kinds can lead to useful information.

Another popular distinction is between pure educational research and non-doctrinal or empirical research. On the contrary, the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches may be the best way to achieve the objectives of the research work. It is generally accepted that the use of more than one method enhances the validity and credibility of research. To some extent, this depends on the training of the researcher and the nature of the research questions. But choosing one method to the exclusion of others may be counterproductive for the further development of jurisprudence. Legal research is the process of identifying and retrieving the information needed to support judicial decision-making. In the broadest sense, legal research encompasses every step of an approach that begins with the analysis of the facts of a problem and ends with the application and communication of the results of the investigation. On the other hand, research methodology refers to the set of methods that guide thinking in a particular field of study. A methodology is a rationale or justification for the research approach and deals with the overall strategy or approach of the research activity. Legal research is also necessary to determine the law on a particular subject or subject, to point out inherent ambiguities and weaknesses of the law, and to critically examine legal provisions, principles or doctrines to see the coherence, coherence and stability of the law, to make proposals for law reform. The researcher must properly explain why he or she uses a particular method to evaluate the results of the research, either by himself or by others. The adoption of a particular methodology should flow from the objective and purpose of the research.

Empirical legal research describes how the role of legislation, regulation, legal policy, and other legal arrangements in society can be examined. It serves as a guide for paralegals, lawyers, and law students to empirical legal research covering history, methods, evidence, knowledge acquisition, and connections to normativity. This multidisciplinary approach combines ideas and approaches from various social sciences, evaluation studies, big data analysis and empirical ethics. However, legal research usually suggests tasks such as: You need to provide ACC rates and insightful advice, and design documents effectively. All of these investigations into factual and legal issues require legal knowledge, skill, rigor and preparation of lawyers for effective representation of clients.10 Methodology is the trained and scientific examination of the principles and facts of each subject. The methodology helps readers understand research methods to discover the truth and assess the validity of results. The methodology is a systematic survey that provides information to guide legal research. The first chapter introduces the topic by explaining keywords such as research, legal research, method and methodology.

By linking knowledge and research, the useful nature of the knowledge that influences research becomes clear. It briefly lists and explains various purposes of legal research such as exploration, description, historical explanation, legal reform, prediction, and publication. It traces the historical evolution of legal research in India through antiquity, the Middle Ages, the colonial period and modern times. He notes that legal research has become systematic and widespread only with an orderly growth of legal education. Finally, it lists various methods of legal research in the categories of doctrinal, non-doctrinal and integrated methods of legal research. The reader has a basic idea of legal research, its past, present and future, and an overview of its broader canvas. Qualitative research involves a more explicit evaluation or interpretation or critical evaluation of a problem. In terms of jurisprudence, the qualitative method is used to analyze legal propositions or legal theories or doctrines and to examine existing legal theses and cases in the light of propositions or doctrines.

2. Statistical research: This type of research is very remarkable in the field of science, especially economics, trade, etc. But as far as the law is concerned, it can certainly be said that it will only be useful to propose legislative reform. However, there are people who believe that this type of research can also be applied in the field of law.